Conduct Covenant
![]() |
Dean L. Gregory Jones |
Developed over a six-year period of conversation, the Conduct Covenant represents a revision of the Divinity School's Honor Code. The Covenant adopted is brief, followed by a section of interpretation/exposition and one on “Covenant Keeping.” The interpretation/exposition section is designed to foster conversations about the significance of the Covenant itself, recognizing that this will be an ongoing process for the whole community.
One might ask: “Should there be a Conduct Covenant at Duke Divinity School at all?” In our judgment, we owe it to ourselves, to the churches, and to the wider world to maintain moral matters as integral to theological study and its connections to Christian life. The Divinity School's central activity is preparing men and women for Christian ministry. Such preparation inherently involves moral judgments, both in terms of the shaping of communities and the shaping of our own character as particular people. Over the years the School has wrestled with whether there should be a covenant at all - as well as what should go into a covenant were one to be adopted. I believe it is the Divinity School's intention, and commitment, to use such a Covenant to open up conversations over time in ways that will help cultivate wise judgment. And I am heartened by the many students and faculty who are receiving this Covenant warmly and in the spirit in which it was written and adopted.
Will reasonable people disagree about the wisdom of having a Covenant at all, as well as about particular judgments on various issues? Undoubtedly so. Have we developed a perfect Covenant? Undoubtedly not. Even so, we believe that the best response is not to abandon the conversations, but to deepen and extend them over the years in the most life-giving ways possible for the whole community and in service to God.
There has been some recent publicity that involves misunderstanding and misreadings of the Covenant. We invite you to read for yourself.

